Release/v0.4.1 #1

2025-10-27T14:59:33+03:00

rus07tam commented

2025-10-27 14:59:33 +03:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Changelog:

Update README
Added cond to rx
Added get_fields to Field
Fixed AsyncBindable & Bindable
Improved ClassProperty
Added name and __slots__ to Property

Changelog: - Update README - Added `cond` to `rx` - Added `get_fields` to `Field` - Fixed `AsyncBindable` & `Bindable` - Improved `ClassProperty` - Added name and `__slots__` to `Property`

codacy-production[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2025-10-27 15:04:50 +03:00

src/snakia/property/readonly.py

					
				@ -5,1 +6,4 @@

				class Readonly[T](Property[T]):

				    """

codacy-production[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2025-10-27 15:04:50 +03:00

🚫 Codacy found a high ErrorProne issue: invalid syntax (F999)

The issue arises from the use of generics in the class definition. The syntax Readonly[T](Property[T]) is incorrect in Python, as the use of generics requires the Generic base class from the typing module. To fix this, you need to inherit from Generic[T] in addition to Property[T].

Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue:

class Readonly(Property[T], Generic[T]):

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

:no_entry_sign: **Codacy** found a **high ErrorProne** issue: [invalid syntax (F999)](https://app.codacy.com/gh/RuJect/snakia/pull-requests/1) The issue arises from the use of generics in the class definition. The syntax `Readonly[T](Property[T])` is incorrect in Python, as the use of generics requires the `Generic` base class from the `typing` module. To fix this, you need to inherit from `Generic[T]` in addition to `Property[T]`. Here's the code suggestion to fix the issue: ```suggestion class Readonly(Property[T], Generic[T]): ``` --- *This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.*

codacy-production[bot] (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2025-10-27 15:04:50 +03:00

src/snakia/core/rx/cond.py

					
				@ -0,0 +1,13 @@

				from typing import Callable

				def cond[**P, T, F](

codacy-production[bot] (Migrated from github.com) commented

2025-10-27 15:04:50 +03:00

🚫 Codacy found a high ErrorProne issue: expected '(' (F999)

The issue reported by the Prospector linter is due to the incorrect syntax used for the type parameters in the function definition. In Python's type hinting, you cannot use square brackets [] for defining type variables; instead, you should use parentheses () with the TypeVar function from the typing module.

To fix the issue, you need to change the definition of the cond function to use TypeVar for the type parameters. Here's the single line change needed:

def cond(P, T, F)(condition: Callable[P, bool], if_true: Callable[P, T], if_false: Callable[P, F]) -> Callable[P, T | F]:

This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.

:no_entry_sign: **Codacy** found a **high ErrorProne** issue: [expected '(' (F999)](https://app.codacy.com/gh/RuJect/snakia/pull-requests/1) The issue reported by the Prospector linter is due to the incorrect syntax used for the type parameters in the function definition. In Python's type hinting, you cannot use square brackets `[]` for defining type variables; instead, you should use parentheses `()` with the `TypeVar` function from the `typing` module. To fix the issue, you need to change the definition of the `cond` function to use `TypeVar` for the type parameters. Here's the single line change needed: ```suggestion def cond(P, T, F)(condition: Callable[P, bool], if_true: Callable[P, T], if_false: Callable[P, F]) -> Callable[P, T | F]: ``` --- *This comment was generated by an experimental AI tool.*

Sign in to join this conversation.

No reviewers